In this last and final blog post I am going to focus on a very common theme that I have been working on the whole semester and I thought I should end on and thats dehumanization. I am going to Focus on this theme in the short story called Sexy by Jhumpa Lahiri. I feel like this theme can apply to this story in many ways. My prime example is just how Dev seems to be using Miranda only for sex and in the story it seems to be this way. For example, "The first Sunday she opened the door in the knee-length robe, but Dev didn't even notice it; he carried her
over to the bed, wearing sweatpants and sneakers, and entered her without a word. Later, she slipped on the
robe when she walked across the room to get him a saucer for his cigarette ashes, but he complained that
she was depriving him of the sight of her long legs, and demanded that she remove it."(7). It things like this that shows that Miranda is just being used and to me thats an example of dehumanization.
I can relate this to other classes and other movies that come to mind. I think of back in my English class in 8th grade and we read a book about a girl who was in the sex trade. Even though these are completely different circumstances it did remind me of that. How woman are being used as objects for sexual pleasures. I also see this type of thing in Game of Thrones with the brothels and just having the woman there used as sex objects not real actual people.
When readong this story and using that quote I think it makes a pretty significant impact on Miranda throughout the story. I think she is double guessing herself as the story goes on and guys in general. For example she questioned when Rohin tells her shes beautiful. ""What does it mean?”
“What?"
"That word. 'Sexy.' What does it mean?"
He looked down, suddenly shy. "I can't tell you."
"Why not?"
"It's a secret." He pressed his lips together, so hard that a bit of them went white.
"Tell me the secret. I want to know."
Rohin sat on the bed beside Miranda and began to kick the edge of the mattress with the backs of his
shoes. He giggled nervously, his thin body flinching as if it were being tickled.
"Tell me," Miranda demanded. She leaned over and gripped his ankles, holding his feet still." (16). I think this relationship she has with Dev is really putting her down and it shows. She's to me being used as a sex object in the cheating relationship. It doesnt seem to be more than that to me. they usually end up doing sexual things every time there together so later when she meets this new guy and realizes there might be other love out there compared to just having sex. She starts to double guess Dev. " "Do you remember that day we went to the Mapparium?"
"Of course."
"Do you remember how we whispered to each other?"
"I remember," Dev whispered playfully.
"Do you remember what you said?"
There was a pause. "'Let's go back to your place.'" He laughed quietly. "Next Sunday, then?"
The day before, as she'd cried,"(17) I think this shows the impact of this type of relationship can have on Miranda and I feel like she does feel dehumanized as she was used just for sexual purposes.
I think this story does show this problem of dehumanization but of a different scale compared to that I was discussing in other projects throughout the semester with slavery. I think this has another impact but can be categorized in the same subject. As Miranda was used as the sex object and never really caught up on it throughout the novel and when she did she started second guessing other men she saw and ultimately this type of action can leave a scar on this young woman's soul.
Thursday, May 11, 2017
Thursday, May 4, 2017
Beloved: Literary Analysis
My theme of Dehumanization is shown a significant amount throughout Uncle Toms Cabin and Beloved, however how they do these things are two different stories. In my last posts about Uncle Toms Cabin I made the claim that dehumanization plays a big factor in the novel but was not as bad as it actually was in real life. I had the impression that it was alittle soft on the subject and never got into the gritty details of the matter at hand. For example this quote from the book "He was possessed of a handsome person and pleasing manners, and was a general favorite in the factory. Nevertheless, as this young man was in the eye of the law not a man, but a thing, all these superior qualifications were subject to the control of a vulgar, narrow-minded, tyrannical master. This same gentleman, having heard of the fame of George's invention, took a ride over to the factory, to see what this intelligent chattel had been about. He was received with great enthusiasm by the employer, who congratulated him on possessing so valuable a slave.
He was waited upon over the factory, shown the machinery by George, who, in high spirits, talked so fluently, held himself so erect, looked so handsome and manly, that his master began to feel an uneasy consciousness of inferiority. What business had his slave to be marching round the country, inventing machines, and holding up his head among gentlemen? He'd soon put a stop to it. He'd take him back, and put him to hoeing and digging, and "see if he'd step about so smart." (10) I feel like this quote shows what Im talking about the best. Its a example of where they do treat George horrible for the work he has been providing and just throw him aside like a used machine. However like I said, I feel like its not as bad as it could be. In Beloved I feel like this was a different story. I feel like Toni Morrison wanted to make sure that you felt the horrors of slavery and really made you feel the pain that they went through. Quotes like "But then they shoved him into the box and dropped the cage door down, his hands quit taking instruction."(126) and "Nobody could make it alone. Not only because trappers picked them off like buzzards or netted them like rabbits, but also because you couldn't run if you didn't know how to go." (159) This shows the direct relationship between the animals and the people that are the slaves. This shows that the people see the slaves just like the animals. The author uses this as a direct relationship to show that they are doing the same things to the slaves, that they do to the animals. This really shows the characteristics that I am talking about. Treating these people like animals or pieces of property and not human beings which is really shown in Beloved. As I have said before that in our fishbowl discussion during Uncle Toms Cabin we did bring up this issue on how We had not felt that wow moment yet and then questioned if we would feel this in a distant future in the novel. However we never got that feeling. In our discussion of Beloved I feel we didn't go over it as much as I thought we would however I think we would of all agreed that we felt that multiple times throughout the novel. Then also in Beloved we talked about the idea of home and that as a slave there is no place where you can feel like your at home. Which I feel is really hard because you never felt secure and I feel like you can put this under that category of dehumanization because you cant live that normal life. Your always on the run and you always felt looked down upon your peers and that life will keep on haunting you as being that piece of property and that is just as bad as being treated as a piece of property. I feel like the essay I wrote about and read in my first post comparing Beloved to that other novel really shows the message and I finally got that "Oh Shit" moment Ive been waiting for since Uncle Toms Cabin and I feel in Beloved it brings that and that essay brings it more, explaining little details I took for granted which have a deeper meaning and understanding which I really appreciated.
He was waited upon over the factory, shown the machinery by George, who, in high spirits, talked so fluently, held himself so erect, looked so handsome and manly, that his master began to feel an uneasy consciousness of inferiority. What business had his slave to be marching round the country, inventing machines, and holding up his head among gentlemen? He'd soon put a stop to it. He'd take him back, and put him to hoeing and digging, and "see if he'd step about so smart." (10) I feel like this quote shows what Im talking about the best. Its a example of where they do treat George horrible for the work he has been providing and just throw him aside like a used machine. However like I said, I feel like its not as bad as it could be. In Beloved I feel like this was a different story. I feel like Toni Morrison wanted to make sure that you felt the horrors of slavery and really made you feel the pain that they went through. Quotes like "But then they shoved him into the box and dropped the cage door down, his hands quit taking instruction."(126) and "Nobody could make it alone. Not only because trappers picked them off like buzzards or netted them like rabbits, but also because you couldn't run if you didn't know how to go." (159) This shows the direct relationship between the animals and the people that are the slaves. This shows that the people see the slaves just like the animals. The author uses this as a direct relationship to show that they are doing the same things to the slaves, that they do to the animals. This really shows the characteristics that I am talking about. Treating these people like animals or pieces of property and not human beings which is really shown in Beloved. As I have said before that in our fishbowl discussion during Uncle Toms Cabin we did bring up this issue on how We had not felt that wow moment yet and then questioned if we would feel this in a distant future in the novel. However we never got that feeling. In our discussion of Beloved I feel we didn't go over it as much as I thought we would however I think we would of all agreed that we felt that multiple times throughout the novel. Then also in Beloved we talked about the idea of home and that as a slave there is no place where you can feel like your at home. Which I feel is really hard because you never felt secure and I feel like you can put this under that category of dehumanization because you cant live that normal life. Your always on the run and you always felt looked down upon your peers and that life will keep on haunting you as being that piece of property and that is just as bad as being treated as a piece of property. I feel like the essay I wrote about and read in my first post comparing Beloved to that other novel really shows the message and I finally got that "Oh Shit" moment Ive been waiting for since Uncle Toms Cabin and I feel in Beloved it brings that and that essay brings it more, explaining little details I took for granted which have a deeper meaning and understanding which I really appreciated.
Beloved: Reader Response
In this post I am going to explore different reviews on different websites and see what other people had to say about the book itself and what their thoughts of it were.
GoodReads- On here it gives the book a 3.76 out of 5 stars. Which is okay. I see mutliple reviews that are good like usual but there was some themes that people mentioned but used them for good and bad reasons. For this review it was a negative one and I found it interesting because someone said the samethings but gave the book a good review because of it.:
I don't give books low marks lightly. If anything, I am prone to being carried away by the author's enthusaism and rate books more highly than they deserve. I am an aspiring author, myself, and that also leads me to be kind to the books.
That being said, I really hated this book.
I like fantasy and magical realism. I find the dreams and allegories that live just underneath the skin of the world we can more readily see and touch endlessly fascinating. I like my stories intense and emotional, and I like it when characters are so full of passion that it obscures their sense of the world around them.
That being said, I really hated this book.
I found Beloved incomprehensible to the point of absurdity. It's one thing to have a book that is full of magic and poetry or to have a character's passion overwhelm their ability to describe the world from time to time, but I also need to know what is going on. For the story to grab me, I need to know what the story is.
Did I mention that I really hated this book?
I know it's trendy to read Toni Morrison, but I recommend this book to absolutely no one. I found it a borderline insulting waste of my time.
Barnes and Noble-
On this website they have it 4 out of 5 stars which seems to be the overall trend of things. Either people said it was a good book or whenever there was a lower review it talked about how confusing it was just like the review about in Goodreads. Heres what this review had to say:
It was a good book, but hard to read. I don't know how good the movie was, but if it's true enough to the book, I might recommend watching that rather than trying to push through the book.
Still, it's worth reading if only to get a new insight into the world of slavery and racism that raged (and still lingers) in America and the world.
GoodReads- On here it gives the book a 3.76 out of 5 stars. Which is okay. I see mutliple reviews that are good like usual but there was some themes that people mentioned but used them for good and bad reasons. For this review it was a negative one and I found it interesting because someone said the samethings but gave the book a good review because of it.:
I don't give books low marks lightly. If anything, I am prone to being carried away by the author's enthusaism and rate books more highly than they deserve. I am an aspiring author, myself, and that also leads me to be kind to the books.
That being said, I really hated this book.
I like fantasy and magical realism. I find the dreams and allegories that live just underneath the skin of the world we can more readily see and touch endlessly fascinating. I like my stories intense and emotional, and I like it when characters are so full of passion that it obscures their sense of the world around them.
That being said, I really hated this book.
I found Beloved incomprehensible to the point of absurdity. It's one thing to have a book that is full of magic and poetry or to have a character's passion overwhelm their ability to describe the world from time to time, but I also need to know what is going on. For the story to grab me, I need to know what the story is.
Did I mention that I really hated this book?
I know it's trendy to read Toni Morrison, but I recommend this book to absolutely no one. I found it a borderline insulting waste of my time.
Barnes and Noble-
On this website they have it 4 out of 5 stars which seems to be the overall trend of things. Either people said it was a good book or whenever there was a lower review it talked about how confusing it was just like the review about in Goodreads. Heres what this review had to say:
Overall I had a hard time with this book. It was a very slow
read for me, often talking itself in circles and leaving me confused. Still, I
found the story very interesting and thought provoking. I felt awful for Sethe
and her family and for the trials they had to endure. Even though, as I
mentioned above, I felt that the 'slavery' theme often got overshadowed, I was
still struck by the awful fact that slavery did exist (still exists some places
in the world) and just how awful it was. Even the "good" slave owners
(of "Sweet Home" where Sethe ran from) were despicable and made me
shrink in shame.
It was a good book, but hard to read. I don't know how good
the movie was, but if it's true enough to the book, I might recommend watching
that rather than trying to push through the book.
Still, it's worth reading if only to get a new insight into
the world of slavery and racism that raged (and still lingers) in America and
the world.
Amazon-
On here the overall rating is good just like the other websites. On here its overall ratings is 4.1 stars out of 5 which is really good. Most of these reviews on here are 5 stars and the have nothing but good things to say about the novel. But it does say again that its still difficult to read and heres a 5 star rating but they talk about this issue that I've been seeing in the reviews.
I found that I needed to understand the genuine horrors of slavery before I could understand this book. You have to know why Sethe does what she does before you can grasp her actions. Toni Morrison makes that difficult to do . . . maybe she doesn't want anyone to read it who isn't prepared to give their souls to it. So be prepared not to read in your usual way. They aren't just words to be taken in at your normal pace. You'll read, and re-read, and break it down, accept it, then go back and read it again. We all should be changed by this book
Overall I had a hard time with this book. It was a very slow read for me, often talking itself in circles and leaving me confused. Still, I found the story very interesting and thought provoking. I felt awful for Sethe and her family and for the trials they had to endure. Even though, as I mentioned above, I felt that the 'slavery' theme often got overshadowed, I was still struck by the awful fact that slavery did exist (still exists some places in the world) and just how awful it was. Even the "good" slave owners (of "Sweet Home" where Sethe ran from) were despicable and made me shrink in shame. It was a good book, but hard to read. I don't know how good the movie was, but if it's true enough to the book, I might recommend watching that rather than trying to push through the book.
Still, it's worth reading if only to get a new insight into the world of slavery and racism that raged (and still lingers) in America and the world.
Beloved: Contemporary Connections
When looking at the biggest issue of dehumanization of African Americans in 2017, I think the most prolific issue has been police brutality and our criminal justice system. This can be seen from both sides especially through groups like Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter. In today's America we face this issue and looking at it through Uncle Toms Cabin and Beloved shows me how both sides tend to view this issue. As looking at it through my topic, I used the theme of dehumanization and I said in my other projects that to me this issue wasn't described as horrible as it really was. Almost like just scratching the surface, especially for an anti-slavery novel. Then with Beloved it goes into the details and not overemphasize it but really giving a point. I can see this seen in today's version of the police brutality and the dehumanization that is seen with it. Through the Black Lives Matter movement you can see that there message is going to be put through with a point just like Beloved. You can see this with the media as well. If you want to sell a story you want to make it interesting, so you make it sound a lot worse than maybe it was. Where they dont want us to forget these things that are happening and they want to make it sound really bad and that's the message they want to bring. Then with lets say with Police you could say that they are the Uncle Toms Cabin in which with these instances they kinda glaze over these incidents. Now whether or not these things are true or whatever happened or who initiated these incidents to happen will have to talked about at a different time however this is what I see when looking at today's issues through these two books.
http://www-lexisnexis-com.ezproxy.uwc.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/?verb=sr&csi=6742&sr=HEADLINE(Funeral+Is+Held+for+Brooklyn+Teenager+Killed+by+Police)%2BAND%2BDATE%2BIS%2B2013
http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?res_dat=xri%3Apqm&volume=81&date=2011&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Aarticle&spage=72&issn=0002-9432&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&issue=1&genre=article&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
http://www-lexisnexis-com.ezproxy.uwc.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/?verb=sr&csi=6742&sr=HEADLINE(Funeral+Is+Held+for+Brooklyn+Teenager+Killed+by+Police)%2BAND%2BDATE%2BIS%2B2013
http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?res_dat=xri%3Apqm&volume=81&date=2011&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Aarticle&spage=72&issn=0002-9432&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&issue=1&genre=article&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Race of the American Novel Project: Beloved/Critical Commentary
I read a peer reviewed text that talks about dehumanization of these slaves in "Beloved" as well of another book called "Bacchae" by Soyinka. This essay goes over comparisons between these two novels on how these novels showed characteristics of dehumanization and why these authors used them in particular ways. For example, in the text it says "The works of the two modern writers
and Nobel laureates Morrison and Soyinka unveil the malaise about the past
of the African diaspora. They treat slavery as a crime against humanity and
dramatize how dreadfully it undermines physical capacity, individuality,
and dignity. Elaine Scarry (1985, p. 29) gives voice, in The Body in Pain,
to pain and examines the body as a product of inscription"(90). I think it adds a deeper understanding on the motives and messages Toni Morrison is trying to bring to the novel. In this essay they continue to go over different instances where they show the theme of dehumanization. Later in the article it continues to give more and more examples that go along with the theme and showing how horrifying Morison made slavery. So with this article it helped me understand the motives Toni Morrison might of had when writing all these different instances where the novel goes over dehumanization, and I would have to agree with the articles logic. When reading it, it helped me understand more of that motive Morrison had when writing the book and makes me realize how much impact it now has on how I look back on the novel. For example the article goes over this instance " According to Morrison, millions of Africans were caught in the Middle
Passage. Those who died were denied burial and mourning. The unburied
body is a prime example of the Lacanian real, and Lacan calls the tomb the
first human symbol. Morrison (1987) deals with the relation between dead
bodies and their tombs, between the real and the symbolic. Beloved, her
self, is a walking reminder of the improperly buried"(92). I never thought of this while reading the book but when reading this article it sheds a whole new light and perspective that I didn't see in the novel which makes more sense to me now when I would look back at it. So it made me understand those hidden messages in the novel that I didn't pick up while just reading it and everything they bring up makes sense to me and brings the novel into a new light.
Source: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.uwc.edu/stable/25704096?seq=2#page_scan_tab_contents
Source: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.uwc.edu/stable/25704096?seq=2#page_scan_tab_contents
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Genre Blog Post: Poetry
The theme I am going to focus on in this blog post would be dehumanization in the poem "The Lynching". In the poem there are several lines I would really want to focus on. The first one would be "Hung pitifully o'er the swinging char."(8) and "the ghastly body swaying in the sun". (10) I think this poem really shows off the theme of dehumanization since its all about a lynching anyways.
Well with this theme we recently were talking about discrimination in history and in this class as well. In this class we would go over ways the US in the South would try and disenfranchise the black southerners. They would discourage them by also threatening them or scaring them by lynching them. Then in our class we talked about slavery with Uncle Toms Cabin in which slavery was the ultimate show of dehumanization. In my past blogs I talked about dehumanization in which that during a slave auction they would treat these human beings were treated as objects to sell.In that essay I used they talked about just that and that they were polished and trimmed and tested on their physical traits. Then they would be ripped away from their families like they were nothing to the buyers and they didn't care if they ripped away a mother and child. This is they stuff that show dehumanization that's also showed in this poem.
In these quotes it really shows the dehumanization of a human by lynching them for show. It talks about hung over the swinging char, which I assume is maybe charcoal which means they burned the body or had a fire going underneath them making the lynching so much more gruesome. Then the quote where it talks about the body swaying in a ghastly state. I think this is very spooky and one of the most powerful descriptive lines of the poem. It paints a picture in my mind that it just overall spooky and horrifying. I almost think of a scene from scooby doo with the spookiness but obviously the lynching is way more horrifying than any episode could produce. There was another line in the poem that I would want to touch up on. It states "And the little lads, lynchers that were to be,"(13). I think this line is very powerful and shows the characteristics of the time in the south. It means two things. The first is that these children were born white southerners and would be raised to terrify these black southerns, but I find something more powerful in the second thing I thought of. I was thinking these are children who are witnessing this. Usually children arent meant to see such terrible things you would think. So what makes it so that the children are there? Well it was made to be a public event. This was a spectacle that anyone would go to and would go see it as entertainment or something else. This shows the characteristics of these southerners treating something like this, like its no big deal. Almost like its a circus act, which in its own way is dehumanization towards the African American. They arent concerned with this lynching of this man because they are better and they treat him like an animal to be slaughtered in front of men, women and even children.
With this poem you can really see the discrimination of African Americans even after slavery was abolished. Lynching usually happened more after slavery but it did happen during slavery dont get me wrong but in most history classes we talk about in more in the years after slavery was abolished. These problems of dehumanization has taken new forms in the later years such as segregated facilities and hosing of African Americans. Things like this towards African Americans show dehumanization. All these acts make them seem less than the person in the act and this poem shows such thing.
Well with this theme we recently were talking about discrimination in history and in this class as well. In this class we would go over ways the US in the South would try and disenfranchise the black southerners. They would discourage them by also threatening them or scaring them by lynching them. Then in our class we talked about slavery with Uncle Toms Cabin in which slavery was the ultimate show of dehumanization. In my past blogs I talked about dehumanization in which that during a slave auction they would treat these human beings were treated as objects to sell.In that essay I used they talked about just that and that they were polished and trimmed and tested on their physical traits. Then they would be ripped away from their families like they were nothing to the buyers and they didn't care if they ripped away a mother and child. This is they stuff that show dehumanization that's also showed in this poem.
In these quotes it really shows the dehumanization of a human by lynching them for show. It talks about hung over the swinging char, which I assume is maybe charcoal which means they burned the body or had a fire going underneath them making the lynching so much more gruesome. Then the quote where it talks about the body swaying in a ghastly state. I think this is very spooky and one of the most powerful descriptive lines of the poem. It paints a picture in my mind that it just overall spooky and horrifying. I almost think of a scene from scooby doo with the spookiness but obviously the lynching is way more horrifying than any episode could produce. There was another line in the poem that I would want to touch up on. It states "And the little lads, lynchers that were to be,"(13). I think this line is very powerful and shows the characteristics of the time in the south. It means two things. The first is that these children were born white southerners and would be raised to terrify these black southerns, but I find something more powerful in the second thing I thought of. I was thinking these are children who are witnessing this. Usually children arent meant to see such terrible things you would think. So what makes it so that the children are there? Well it was made to be a public event. This was a spectacle that anyone would go to and would go see it as entertainment or something else. This shows the characteristics of these southerners treating something like this, like its no big deal. Almost like its a circus act, which in its own way is dehumanization towards the African American. They arent concerned with this lynching of this man because they are better and they treat him like an animal to be slaughtered in front of men, women and even children.
With this poem you can really see the discrimination of African Americans even after slavery was abolished. Lynching usually happened more after slavery but it did happen during slavery dont get me wrong but in most history classes we talk about in more in the years after slavery was abolished. These problems of dehumanization has taken new forms in the later years such as segregated facilities and hosing of African Americans. Things like this towards African Americans show dehumanization. All these acts make them seem less than the person in the act and this poem shows such thing.
Tuesday, March 21, 2017
Genre Blog Post:Drama
In this blog I am going to talk about a certain theme in the play A Streetcar named Desire. The theme I am going to explore is gender roles in the play and see what impacts it has on the play. I think a line that fits this pretty good is when Mitch says "Poker shouldn't be played in a house with women". (1137) I think when exploring this we will see this theme played out and how certain genders are portrayed by the other gender.
To connect this you see this theme presented in many works in many other classes. One I want to talk about that really was a jump start for the Women movement to give themselves independence is Margaret Sanger. I feel like I can connect her beliefs that I learned in History 102 to this play. She believed that with Birth Control a women would be able to control her own destiny and be her own persona and the man wouldn't control her. I can somewhat connect this to the play in a way. In the play the women seem to have little control of the household as the men seem to be in control of things, or at least act like they are. They look down on the women and it shows when they are told to do stuff or they cant have any secrets to themselves. For example, Blanches suitcase was looked through by Stanley because he didn't trust what she all had and had nothing from the estate. I feel like with Margaret arguments that women should be more independent and be less dependent on the men cause in the play it can show the consequences of this as the women seem to not have much power in this play.
When referring back to the quote from above you can see the women's discrimination shown in that line. When he says that, he basically is saying that women are not worthy to be around while to MEN are working a very strategic game of poker that women cannot be around or interfere at all. I fell like this is a shot at them seeing that Mitch thinks that the women are inferior and don't have the privilege to be around while the game is taking place. You can see these themes shown to in other parts of the play as well. For example when Stanley goes on his rant about the Napoleonic code on page 1129. He basically saying that whatever is hers is his. Showing that she has no power over him and that he can go and take whatever she owns because its his as well. Almost treating her in a way that she is his property and can do whatever he want with her and her stuff. Another thing that goes on within the play is the domestic violence of the relationships between the couples in the play. It always seems that someone is hitting another for an argument. For example, when Stella kept on turning on the radio during the poker game. Stanley eventually got mad and started hitting Stella showing his dominance over her.
I think by looking at the play this way shows inequality between the genders and the roles the woman would have to play under the mans shadow. This gives the impression throughout the play of the discrimination of women and how their treated as objects through the play. My best examples are the treatment Stanley has towards the two women, Stella and Blanche. With this analysis and looking for this theme I can see the picture much more clearly when reading this play. I think this issue can lead to the whole inequality between men and women. This can be connected from today to the year this play was made and see the comparisons and differences of the time.
To connect this you see this theme presented in many works in many other classes. One I want to talk about that really was a jump start for the Women movement to give themselves independence is Margaret Sanger. I feel like I can connect her beliefs that I learned in History 102 to this play. She believed that with Birth Control a women would be able to control her own destiny and be her own persona and the man wouldn't control her. I can somewhat connect this to the play in a way. In the play the women seem to have little control of the household as the men seem to be in control of things, or at least act like they are. They look down on the women and it shows when they are told to do stuff or they cant have any secrets to themselves. For example, Blanches suitcase was looked through by Stanley because he didn't trust what she all had and had nothing from the estate. I feel like with Margaret arguments that women should be more independent and be less dependent on the men cause in the play it can show the consequences of this as the women seem to not have much power in this play.
When referring back to the quote from above you can see the women's discrimination shown in that line. When he says that, he basically is saying that women are not worthy to be around while to MEN are working a very strategic game of poker that women cannot be around or interfere at all. I fell like this is a shot at them seeing that Mitch thinks that the women are inferior and don't have the privilege to be around while the game is taking place. You can see these themes shown to in other parts of the play as well. For example when Stanley goes on his rant about the Napoleonic code on page 1129. He basically saying that whatever is hers is his. Showing that she has no power over him and that he can go and take whatever she owns because its his as well. Almost treating her in a way that she is his property and can do whatever he want with her and her stuff. Another thing that goes on within the play is the domestic violence of the relationships between the couples in the play. It always seems that someone is hitting another for an argument. For example, when Stella kept on turning on the radio during the poker game. Stanley eventually got mad and started hitting Stella showing his dominance over her.
I think by looking at the play this way shows inequality between the genders and the roles the woman would have to play under the mans shadow. This gives the impression throughout the play of the discrimination of women and how their treated as objects through the play. My best examples are the treatment Stanley has towards the two women, Stella and Blanche. With this analysis and looking for this theme I can see the picture much more clearly when reading this play. I think this issue can lead to the whole inequality between men and women. This can be connected from today to the year this play was made and see the comparisons and differences of the time.
Thursday, March 9, 2017
Race in the American Novel: Literary Analysis
I think my theme is a significant part of the book. The book is practically about the treatment of slaves and how their are treated as things, not human beings. The book is about slavery first of all and slavery is basically the treatment of humans as an object. They "owe" this person and that's the biggest symbol of dehumanization in pretty much world history. I will no analyze some quotes from the book that shows such things. "He was possessed of a handsome person and pleasing manners, and was a general favorite in the factory. Nevertheless, as this young man was in the eye of the law not a man, but a thing, all these superior qualifications were subject to the control of a vulgar, narrow-minded, tyrannical master. This same gentleman, having heard of the fame of George's invention, took a ride over to the factory, to see what this intelligent chattel had been about. He was received with great enthusiasm by the employer, who congratulated him on possessing so valuable a slave.
He was waited upon over the factory, shown the machinery by George, who, in high spirits, talked so fluently, held himself so erect, looked so handsome and manly, that his master began to feel an uneasy consciousness of inferiority. What business had his slave to be marching round the country, inventing machines, and holding up his head among gentlemen? He'd soon put a stop to it. He'd take him back, and put him to hoeing and digging, and "see if he'd step about so smart." (10) This quote really shows how even though George was just as smart and hard working as any other white man he still would be considered a thing/object just cause of him being a slave and the color of his skin. George is one of the better workers at the factory and deserves to be in a better situation but because of his status as a slave he is not allowed to make his own choices which really makes a person human and that right is being taken away from him because of slavery. Another quote I would like to use is this one right here ""I hate him!" said Legree, that night, as he sat up in his bed; "I hate him! And isn't he MINE? Can't I do what I like with him? Who's to hinder, I wonder?" And Legree clenched his fist, and shook it, as if he had something in his hands that he could rend in pieces. (373). This line right here shows the mentality of a slave owner and thinking that these human beings are just their property. Legree even says "cant I do what I like with him" which really lowers a persons moral when they are treated like dirty and an object which is really demoralizing to a person when treated like this time and time again.
In our discussions in class I think we touched up on all these different subjects but I think we almost touched on the dehumanization of these slaves. In our fishbowl discussion we talked many different subjects like religion and discrimination on woman. We did touch up on my theme but briefly. We talked about how we haven't had that "Oh Shit" moment in the novel. However, we take that for granted in a book about slavery. In class we talked about how how the treatment of these slaves were inhumane and we all knew this already. We did discuss however, that this book was a good example of such treatment and its a realistic approach on the subject at hand. I assume we all take this for granted when we know that this book is going to be about slavery we raise our expectations of harsh treatment of these slaves when in reality everything in this book is incredible harsh to the slaves and treats these human beings as objects. Reading this book I took this for granted and was expecting more "exciting" type treatment but after thinking about it anything that went down in this novel was terrible treatment of a human being, and I am grateful that I'm not in this situation myself. In my project I saw this terrible treatment in the essay I read about with the auction of slaves. That was really eye opening on how they treat people as objects. They would polish them up and make them look good to sell and they tested each slave on what they could do or their skills. They would also examine them as an object and they would just touch them to make sure they were worth buying. To me that essay was one of the real eye opening experiences throughout that project and probably my favorite read of the class so far.
He was waited upon over the factory, shown the machinery by George, who, in high spirits, talked so fluently, held himself so erect, looked so handsome and manly, that his master began to feel an uneasy consciousness of inferiority. What business had his slave to be marching round the country, inventing machines, and holding up his head among gentlemen? He'd soon put a stop to it. He'd take him back, and put him to hoeing and digging, and "see if he'd step about so smart." (10) This quote really shows how even though George was just as smart and hard working as any other white man he still would be considered a thing/object just cause of him being a slave and the color of his skin. George is one of the better workers at the factory and deserves to be in a better situation but because of his status as a slave he is not allowed to make his own choices which really makes a person human and that right is being taken away from him because of slavery. Another quote I would like to use is this one right here ""I hate him!" said Legree, that night, as he sat up in his bed; "I hate him! And isn't he MINE? Can't I do what I like with him? Who's to hinder, I wonder?" And Legree clenched his fist, and shook it, as if he had something in his hands that he could rend in pieces. (373). This line right here shows the mentality of a slave owner and thinking that these human beings are just their property. Legree even says "cant I do what I like with him" which really lowers a persons moral when they are treated like dirty and an object which is really demoralizing to a person when treated like this time and time again.
In our discussions in class I think we touched up on all these different subjects but I think we almost touched on the dehumanization of these slaves. In our fishbowl discussion we talked many different subjects like religion and discrimination on woman. We did touch up on my theme but briefly. We talked about how we haven't had that "Oh Shit" moment in the novel. However, we take that for granted in a book about slavery. In class we talked about how how the treatment of these slaves were inhumane and we all knew this already. We did discuss however, that this book was a good example of such treatment and its a realistic approach on the subject at hand. I assume we all take this for granted when we know that this book is going to be about slavery we raise our expectations of harsh treatment of these slaves when in reality everything in this book is incredible harsh to the slaves and treats these human beings as objects. Reading this book I took this for granted and was expecting more "exciting" type treatment but after thinking about it anything that went down in this novel was terrible treatment of a human being, and I am grateful that I'm not in this situation myself. In my project I saw this terrible treatment in the essay I read about with the auction of slaves. That was really eye opening on how they treat people as objects. They would polish them up and make them look good to sell and they tested each slave on what they could do or their skills. They would also examine them as an object and they would just touch them to make sure they were worth buying. To me that essay was one of the real eye opening experiences throughout that project and probably my favorite read of the class so far.
Race of the American Novel
My theme will be the a combination of dehumanization. In these up coming blogs I will talk about how these things in the Novel will treat these slaves as products and not people.
Race of the American Novel: Critical Commentary
I choose the commentary from James Baldwin and his main argument is that Stowe didn't represent as well for a protest novel the realism of being human. He goes onto saying that "The failure of the protest novel lies in the rejection of life, the human being, the denial of his beauty, dread, power, in its insistence that it is his categorization alone which is real and which can not be transcended." What I think he means here is that the harsh realities that would of come out of the real world cannot be translated into a book. Yet I think its a good representation of what it might be like to be a slave, I don't think its as realistic as it truly was. I think that in order to truly write the horrors or tragic events you need to be in that situation and fell those emotions, you can never really know what that's truly like unless you experience it yourself and I think that's what James is trying to get at here is that when Stowe writes this novel, its not as realistic as it could be because she truly wasn't in those situations so she wouldn't know as much. You cant really imagine how these things could be unless you experience it yourself. As going back to my theme I think it helps me understand that its hard to write those emotions you would feel being torn apart from your loved ones and I think Stowe does a very good job of doing this but when I read this review I still feel this way however its true that you cant truly know what their feeling unless you're in the situation itself. I have to agree with him on this I do think that's its hard to write the harsh realities of the human nature and emotion and put it into pages. However, I do feel like Stowe does a good job with this even though its hard to do. So I would have to disagree with him on Stowe didn't do this completely.
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Race and the American Novel Project: Reader Response
Here in this post I am going to explore different responses from different websites about Uncle Toms Cabin.
Goodreads-
On this website they tend to be all over the place it seems. Majority of it good though. I see a lot of 5 stars, but there are some negative reviews though. Most of the positive reviews say "its a life changing book" or how its moved them in some sort of way, that its a great historical piece that has stood the test of time but what I found most interesting is the negative reviews. Here's one of them. "I know, I know, it's a monumental artifact in American history, and the catalyst to the spread of the abolitionist movement to the masses. I totally appreciate the historical and cultural significance of this book. No question. But seriously, y'all? This book SUCKS as a piece of literature. For real. I just can't get past how bad the writing is" I find this interesting because this is what most of the negative reviews are like. The never say its not a historically significant piece but either the writing is boring or the story is slow moving, etc. I do somewhat agree with this that ts not the most exciting novel with a ton of action but that's what you have to expect when you read one of these novels.
Barnes and Noble- On this website I see mostly 5 star reviews. For example most of the reviews I see is that this is a work that shows great in depth look into the slave trade and even though that it was not 100% facts it was a great example of these things that was going on during the slave trade. For example one of the reviews go onto say "This incredible book opens a window into the seedier side of American slave trade history. Written with compassion and realism Uncle Toms Cabin exposes the harsh realities of plantation life in the south. Many of the fictional characters and their circumstances were developed by Ms. Stowe from actual individuals." Throughout these reviews this is the trend you see and I have to agree with these reviews when they talk about the in-depth look into the slave trade and I do have to agree with them there.
Amazon-Again it tends that this novel gets very good reviews. On amazon it shows that its a little higher than 4/5 stars. Most of the reviews are positive I saw one bad review but that was for a weird situation with a car ride and some reading aloud and it went to fast to understand, but the actual overall mood on these reviews were positive. For example, "This story written so very long ago, so many of the situations and comments were topical and relevant to the current event of the time it was written, and yet this story still has something valuable to say to people living in our modern world.
That there is value in every life, that hope and faith (either or both) will pull you through almost any tragedy or any horrific situation that cold heartless and thoughtless humans can throw at a person.
It is most incredible to me that at the time of publishing, even the church was confident in stating that slavery was not so bad, that there were "good masters" and that incidents of cruelty and harm were rare. But they were blind and false in their conclusions. There may have been some kind masters but as was shown many times in the story, the slave's life with them was tenuous at best. A kind master's death or debt would invariably mean every possession would be sold. And each of his slaves were as much a chattel as his furniture. It is difficult to assimilate that attitude now. Families were routinely ripped apart, babies and children taken from mothers, husbands or wives taken and sold separately and told they should just forget their spouse and marry another. Horribly violent beatings and living conditions bad enough to demoralize anyone and destroy any hope of kindness or relief.
Only a few people stood out as having any kindness and love or actively did and said things that would improve the lives of the slaves.
The characters depicted, were drawn from true life and experiences of the author and those known to her. The most incredible incidences of the tale are also depicitons of true events and all this makes Uncle Tom's Cabin a story that is worth anyone's time.
Even without those elements of truth, the story rolls along with colourful descriptions of both character and place so as to bring the whole tale to life in a most realistic way.
I am so glad that I read this book. Harriet Beacher Stowe is an amazing storyteller and a powerful teacher for what is right, just and good." This review pretty much sums up all the good ones combined and I have to agree with these. Yet this book is not the most exciting read to me but its story and historical significance makes it an incredible story that everyone should hear or read to get a better outlook on life.
Goodreads-
On this website they tend to be all over the place it seems. Majority of it good though. I see a lot of 5 stars, but there are some negative reviews though. Most of the positive reviews say "its a life changing book" or how its moved them in some sort of way, that its a great historical piece that has stood the test of time but what I found most interesting is the negative reviews. Here's one of them. "I know, I know, it's a monumental artifact in American history, and the catalyst to the spread of the abolitionist movement to the masses. I totally appreciate the historical and cultural significance of this book. No question. But seriously, y'all? This book SUCKS as a piece of literature. For real. I just can't get past how bad the writing is" I find this interesting because this is what most of the negative reviews are like. The never say its not a historically significant piece but either the writing is boring or the story is slow moving, etc. I do somewhat agree with this that ts not the most exciting novel with a ton of action but that's what you have to expect when you read one of these novels.
Barnes and Noble- On this website I see mostly 5 star reviews. For example most of the reviews I see is that this is a work that shows great in depth look into the slave trade and even though that it was not 100% facts it was a great example of these things that was going on during the slave trade. For example one of the reviews go onto say "This incredible book opens a window into the seedier side of American slave trade history. Written with compassion and realism Uncle Toms Cabin exposes the harsh realities of plantation life in the south. Many of the fictional characters and their circumstances were developed by Ms. Stowe from actual individuals." Throughout these reviews this is the trend you see and I have to agree with these reviews when they talk about the in-depth look into the slave trade and I do have to agree with them there.
Amazon-Again it tends that this novel gets very good reviews. On amazon it shows that its a little higher than 4/5 stars. Most of the reviews are positive I saw one bad review but that was for a weird situation with a car ride and some reading aloud and it went to fast to understand, but the actual overall mood on these reviews were positive. For example, "This story written so very long ago, so many of the situations and comments were topical and relevant to the current event of the time it was written, and yet this story still has something valuable to say to people living in our modern world.
That there is value in every life, that hope and faith (either or both) will pull you through almost any tragedy or any horrific situation that cold heartless and thoughtless humans can throw at a person.
It is most incredible to me that at the time of publishing, even the church was confident in stating that slavery was not so bad, that there were "good masters" and that incidents of cruelty and harm were rare. But they were blind and false in their conclusions. There may have been some kind masters but as was shown many times in the story, the slave's life with them was tenuous at best. A kind master's death or debt would invariably mean every possession would be sold. And each of his slaves were as much a chattel as his furniture. It is difficult to assimilate that attitude now. Families were routinely ripped apart, babies and children taken from mothers, husbands or wives taken and sold separately and told they should just forget their spouse and marry another. Horribly violent beatings and living conditions bad enough to demoralize anyone and destroy any hope of kindness or relief.
Only a few people stood out as having any kindness and love or actively did and said things that would improve the lives of the slaves.
The characters depicted, were drawn from true life and experiences of the author and those known to her. The most incredible incidences of the tale are also depicitons of true events and all this makes Uncle Tom's Cabin a story that is worth anyone's time.
Even without those elements of truth, the story rolls along with colourful descriptions of both character and place so as to bring the whole tale to life in a most realistic way.
I am so glad that I read this book. Harriet Beacher Stowe is an amazing storyteller and a powerful teacher for what is right, just and good." This review pretty much sums up all the good ones combined and I have to agree with these. Yet this book is not the most exciting read to me but its story and historical significance makes it an incredible story that everyone should hear or read to get a better outlook on life.
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Race of the American Novel Project:Textual Background and Context
I am going to talk about an essay wrote by Solomon Northup called "A Slave Auction Described by a Slave 1841". In this essay it talks about the horror and treatment or human beings during a slave auction. They are treated like merchandise ready to be prepped and looking pretty for a sale. They are first shaven and cleansed. Usually this was the only time they were treated this way, only to look good for people to buy. They continue on to talk about how they one slave had to play music during it or some had other projects to do. They would then line up and buyers would inspect them and see and test what these slaves were capable of. A couple were bought together so they were happy to at least stay with each other but this one girl Eliza who had a young boy got sold and they were going to be separated and she cried and begged not to go and the new owner told her to knock it off and said he would give her something to cry about. Which then the little boy would say to her that it'll be okay mama don't cry. I think this piece is very powerful and shows the emotion that these slaves went through during an auction, but most importantly worrying about being separated from the ones they love. Which I think is a big theme in Uncle Tomes Cabin is dealing with good things come to an end and that most good things are taken away from you with slavery. For example in Uncle Toms Cabin how it seemed that every good thing would go away like at the beginning with Mr Shelby selling Uncle Tom to which seemed to a good group to be around to Tom meeting a wonderful little girl to only having her die and then eventually having Tom die in the end really put an exclamation point on this theme in the book. I think using this essay helps me understand the impacts of these events and how emotional and terrible being separated from the people you love. I think you cant truly know how it feels by reading it but only through experience you can truly know what its like to have this type of moment running through their head.
Monday, March 6, 2017
Harlem Rensissance
Harlem Renaissance-
In researching this topic I found out some very interesting ideas and new views on the subject. In my high school AP US History class we talked about briefly about the subject at hand and I wanted to learn more about it. In my research I found some very interesting things that I never really thought about. I knew the Harlem Renaissance was a artistic movement based in Harlem with African American ideals, but it was much more than art and literacy to African Americans. What I found out that it was more of a finding of self identity and a celebration of African American culture and that's what I found most interesting of it all.
Connecting this to the readings I feel like the reading connect to the theme that I found in my research about how these pieces of art and readings go about the daily lives of a African American in our Society in America. I feel like in "How it feels to be colored me" it talks about some of the differences she felt even in a more diverse community and I think one of the biggest things that showed from this is that when and her white friend went out and listened to the music she was very moved by the music but when her friend also tuned in she didn't feel the same emotion as she did. I feel that shows how the different styles of music or art within the Harlem community differed from the white community on the outside and how African Americans took pride in their work and that's what the Harlem Renaissance was all about.
I think with this new background knowledge and research I did for the topic helped me understand the whole goal of the piece and understand what each reading stood for. Usually I just look at the story and learn the morals from that but when you look at something like this and loo from the outside in, you can find a lot more details and morals than you would of got with just reading the story itself which I found very interesting.
In this last paragraph I am going to talk about the poem America. I find this one very interesting to read as it describes a lady that really is being quite brutal to the author of the poem. "She feeds me bread of bitterness, and sinks into my throat her tiger's tooth". I feel obviously that this Lady is America or even Lady Liberty. I think both would fit into the description of the piece since their almost the same thing but depicted a little differently. I think in this poem it talks about the obvious discrimination against African Americans through the Jim Crow Laws. Limiting the culture and rights they do want. At the end of the poem I think is the most important part of the whole thing. After countless lines of depicting what I think is what she feels and knows about being an African American in the United States but in the end the last two lines are the most powerful. To me it describes the time to fight for their rights needs to be now or it will slip away through time which is described in the last line of the poem. "Like priceless treasures sinking in the sand"
Sources:
In researching this topic I found out some very interesting ideas and new views on the subject. In my high school AP US History class we talked about briefly about the subject at hand and I wanted to learn more about it. In my research I found some very interesting things that I never really thought about. I knew the Harlem Renaissance was a artistic movement based in Harlem with African American ideals, but it was much more than art and literacy to African Americans. What I found out that it was more of a finding of self identity and a celebration of African American culture and that's what I found most interesting of it all.
Connecting this to the readings I feel like the reading connect to the theme that I found in my research about how these pieces of art and readings go about the daily lives of a African American in our Society in America. I feel like in "How it feels to be colored me" it talks about some of the differences she felt even in a more diverse community and I think one of the biggest things that showed from this is that when and her white friend went out and listened to the music she was very moved by the music but when her friend also tuned in she didn't feel the same emotion as she did. I feel that shows how the different styles of music or art within the Harlem community differed from the white community on the outside and how African Americans took pride in their work and that's what the Harlem Renaissance was all about.
I think with this new background knowledge and research I did for the topic helped me understand the whole goal of the piece and understand what each reading stood for. Usually I just look at the story and learn the morals from that but when you look at something like this and loo from the outside in, you can find a lot more details and morals than you would of got with just reading the story itself which I found very interesting.
In this last paragraph I am going to talk about the poem America. I find this one very interesting to read as it describes a lady that really is being quite brutal to the author of the poem. "She feeds me bread of bitterness, and sinks into my throat her tiger's tooth". I feel obviously that this Lady is America or even Lady Liberty. I think both would fit into the description of the piece since their almost the same thing but depicted a little differently. I think in this poem it talks about the obvious discrimination against African Americans through the Jim Crow Laws. Limiting the culture and rights they do want. At the end of the poem I think is the most important part of the whole thing. After countless lines of depicting what I think is what she feels and knows about being an African American in the United States but in the end the last two lines are the most powerful. To me it describes the time to fight for their rights needs to be now or it will slip away through time which is described in the last line of the poem. "Like priceless treasures sinking in the sand"
Sources:
"Harlem Renaissance." History, www.history.com/topics/black-history/harlem-renaissance.
"The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow: Harlem Renaissance." PBS, www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_events_harlem.html."Claude McKay." Poetry Foundation, www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poets/detail/claude-mckay."Langston Hughes." Poets, www.poets.org/poetsorg/poet/langston-hughes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)